In July 4, 2007 at the summit in Accra, Ghana, under the framework of the African Union summit raised the idea of \u200b\u200bprogress in creating a model of political and economic integration is ambitious but impractical, the United States of Africa.
Tempers negotiating parties are very good but must first be States integrate internally before we can move forward in a global model of attachment.
African
The problem does not lie in the lack of institutional strength of the states or in conflicts between them, if not an ethnic clash inter-tribal and religious in the course of time has caused the deaths of millions of people.
More recently could be attributed to the vast majority of problems in the continent to the poor distribution who carried out the European powers over the territory.
When African political subtext seems to move to the 1940 in the Second World War. Perfectly horizontal and vertical lines that defined what belonged to whom, it is as if there is a more permanent context of conflict.
When the division was carried out, it worked regardless of the individual claims of the peoples who inhabited them. United under the same soil enemy tribes while whole clans were separated, and dominant characteristic of the region.
Although conflicts dating back many years, have been exacerbated by poor living conditions in the region and a constant clash of cultures that seek to dominate against each other.
The institutional framework could ensure widespread that while most African states have them, these are very weak and ends prevail particular organization of the tribes before the same sovereignty. This carries with it a big problem, not be possible to proceed in a model of successful integration to internal conflicts from being decimated country.
There are about 1200 African tribes living peacefully in the continent. His organization, precarious for some, Advanced others is quite far from the current model of state and for that reason have a certain degree of independence in their governance. As to the sense of belonging, plays a more important survival of the tribes that the same unit that groups together states. This is one of the main reasons why the field of state action is diminished by trying to unify them under a larger entity.
Efforts to unite the tribes and exalt nationalism that leads to a union of countries are very far from success and from this it follows most of the complications for the creation of the United States of Africa.
Although the round Raised and left Accra for the analysis of various strategies for states to unite the members of the African Union under a single unit of government were not taken into account the particularities of each of the participating nations, as well as their negotiators have been discredited because for many there is a black past conflicts that claimed thousands of lives.
points discussed were the infrastructure, economic development and political integration. The first point was delegated to the Investment Fund the creation of the PAN African-African Infrastructure Development Institute with private and public funds would develop infrastructure travel and trade, primary engine for achieving economic development in the medium time.
for economic development was proposed to Nigeria as the principal actor. It proposed the creation of a mega highway with a single toll and he finished in lead with Namibia pipeline network and finally the creation of an airport with large hangars that will shape Africa with the current global context.
And last and most important for this case study is part of political integration. Member States agreed to support each other as necessary to consolidate the project of creation of the Federation of African States and meet again to begin negotiations on the macro which could be built.
But 3 months have elapsed since the summit and Africa have developed 4 medium-scale conflicts, none of them among States, all of a tribal way. What might help ensure that it is not necessary to unify the super-state in Africa and the so-called project of the United States of Africa is a failed act, even before its launch.
Tempers negotiating parties are very good but must first be States integrate internally before we can move forward in a global model of attachment.
African
The problem does not lie in the lack of institutional strength of the states or in conflicts between them, if not an ethnic clash inter-tribal and religious in the course of time has caused the deaths of millions of people.
More recently could be attributed to the vast majority of problems in the continent to the poor distribution who carried out the European powers over the territory.
When African political subtext seems to move to the 1940 in the Second World War. Perfectly horizontal and vertical lines that defined what belonged to whom, it is as if there is a more permanent context of conflict.
When the division was carried out, it worked regardless of the individual claims of the peoples who inhabited them. United under the same soil enemy tribes while whole clans were separated, and dominant characteristic of the region.
Although conflicts dating back many years, have been exacerbated by poor living conditions in the region and a constant clash of cultures that seek to dominate against each other.
The institutional framework could ensure widespread that while most African states have them, these are very weak and ends prevail particular organization of the tribes before the same sovereignty. This carries with it a big problem, not be possible to proceed in a model of successful integration to internal conflicts from being decimated country.
There are about 1200 African tribes living peacefully in the continent. His organization, precarious for some, Advanced others is quite far from the current model of state and for that reason have a certain degree of independence in their governance. As to the sense of belonging, plays a more important survival of the tribes that the same unit that groups together states. This is one of the main reasons why the field of state action is diminished by trying to unify them under a larger entity.
Efforts to unite the tribes and exalt nationalism that leads to a union of countries are very far from success and from this it follows most of the complications for the creation of the United States of Africa.
Although the round Raised and left Accra for the analysis of various strategies for states to unite the members of the African Union under a single unit of government were not taken into account the particularities of each of the participating nations, as well as their negotiators have been discredited because for many there is a black past conflicts that claimed thousands of lives.
points discussed were the infrastructure, economic development and political integration. The first point was delegated to the Investment Fund the creation of the PAN African-African Infrastructure Development Institute with private and public funds would develop infrastructure travel and trade, primary engine for achieving economic development in the medium time.
for economic development was proposed to Nigeria as the principal actor. It proposed the creation of a mega highway with a single toll and he finished in lead with Namibia pipeline network and finally the creation of an airport with large hangars that will shape Africa with the current global context.
And last and most important for this case study is part of political integration. Member States agreed to support each other as necessary to consolidate the project of creation of the Federation of African States and meet again to begin negotiations on the macro which could be built.
But 3 months have elapsed since the summit and Africa have developed 4 medium-scale conflicts, none of them among States, all of a tribal way. What might help ensure that it is not necessary to unify the super-state in Africa and the so-called project of the United States of Africa is a failed act, even before its launch.
0 comments:
Post a Comment