An assailant brutally murdered someone for stealing his wallet. They are caught by the police, put into the hands of the prosecution and sentencing of his arrest, punishment, 5 years after all rebates. On the other hand, the family of the victim is torn between grief and powerless to do anything to give a punishment according to a person how are you.
Murders in Colombia by common criminals robbed of life to 126 people monthly. Fathers, mothers, children, students, workers, none is exempt because the potential benefits of carrying out a crime are greater than the penalties which may be submitted in case of capture.
In countries like the United States, Britain, Egypt and many other sentences indicate a clear tendency to escalate, this in order to warn offenders of the consequences to which would be exposed if they decide to commit a particular crime.
But the new regulations in criminal matters in the country today provides greater benefits to criminals who are in the ability to argue a number of circumstances beyond their control (such as childhood abuse, rape, delusions, and even lack employment) to achieve very significant reductions in their sentences, making the crime look like an important means of income.
What are the benefits vs. a criminal. possible punishment when the cell decides to steal a person and, by the way it is hurt?. Assuming that the cell costs $ 500,000 pesos in the market black is able to sell at $ 200,000 pesos, more or less. Now if you were to spend 24 hours being caught in a Permanent Justice Unit, commonly referred to as UPJ, keeping the money in the robbery and found the possibility to continue next day with their work (or theft).
If one considers that the minimum monthly wage is around $ 485,000 pesos, getting nearly half of this in one day is quite appealing, right?.
There are two sides of the coin. The first aims to address the offenders from their homes themselves, providing a higher quality education and be able to prevent children from becoming potential now criminals tomorrow. The other, its counterpart, is further specified in search severizar penalties for the offender to think twice before acting and be able to measure the consequences that would appeal to him and his family to commit a particular crime.
The proposal is clear, although it is necessary to work with children, so is the increased penalties, including imposing the most severe of all, death.
Psychologists agree that for some criminals the chance of recovery by isolation (ie, jail) are zero (as is the case of Luis Alfredo Garavito) and the probability of recidivism is so high that it would be necessary to make a closer depth of the desirability of a lax and permissive legislation in criminal matters.
addition to this, the moral and ethical responsibility of society, who must punish the black sheep in an exemplary manner so as not to encourage poor litter that ends up hurting all is necessary, and therefore the strongest punishment.
The death penalty then, has provided a clear solution to countries with violent tendencies, and although not universally accepted, the statistics of reducing deaths at the hands of common criminals reflected, as the assailant while still stealing ( since it is inevitable) seeks to cause the least possible damage to its victim, and ultimately things recover but the life of the people do not.
need to think about all these young people, students, housewives, mothers and fathers who left the street one day and never returned. You need to think that those who were killed are now free and very possibly continue doing. It is necessary to make a clean society and leave only those that contribute to its better performance.
Murders in Colombia by common criminals robbed of life to 126 people monthly. Fathers, mothers, children, students, workers, none is exempt because the potential benefits of carrying out a crime are greater than the penalties which may be submitted in case of capture.
In countries like the United States, Britain, Egypt and many other sentences indicate a clear tendency to escalate, this in order to warn offenders of the consequences to which would be exposed if they decide to commit a particular crime.
But the new regulations in criminal matters in the country today provides greater benefits to criminals who are in the ability to argue a number of circumstances beyond their control (such as childhood abuse, rape, delusions, and even lack employment) to achieve very significant reductions in their sentences, making the crime look like an important means of income.
What are the benefits vs. a criminal. possible punishment when the cell decides to steal a person and, by the way it is hurt?. Assuming that the cell costs $ 500,000 pesos in the market black is able to sell at $ 200,000 pesos, more or less. Now if you were to spend 24 hours being caught in a Permanent Justice Unit, commonly referred to as UPJ, keeping the money in the robbery and found the possibility to continue next day with their work (or theft).
If one considers that the minimum monthly wage is around $ 485,000 pesos, getting nearly half of this in one day is quite appealing, right?.
There are two sides of the coin. The first aims to address the offenders from their homes themselves, providing a higher quality education and be able to prevent children from becoming potential now criminals tomorrow. The other, its counterpart, is further specified in search severizar penalties for the offender to think twice before acting and be able to measure the consequences that would appeal to him and his family to commit a particular crime.
The proposal is clear, although it is necessary to work with children, so is the increased penalties, including imposing the most severe of all, death.
Psychologists agree that for some criminals the chance of recovery by isolation (ie, jail) are zero (as is the case of Luis Alfredo Garavito) and the probability of recidivism is so high that it would be necessary to make a closer depth of the desirability of a lax and permissive legislation in criminal matters.
addition to this, the moral and ethical responsibility of society, who must punish the black sheep in an exemplary manner so as not to encourage poor litter that ends up hurting all is necessary, and therefore the strongest punishment.
The death penalty then, has provided a clear solution to countries with violent tendencies, and although not universally accepted, the statistics of reducing deaths at the hands of common criminals reflected, as the assailant while still stealing ( since it is inevitable) seeks to cause the least possible damage to its victim, and ultimately things recover but the life of the people do not.
need to think about all these young people, students, housewives, mothers and fathers who left the street one day and never returned. You need to think that those who were killed are now free and very possibly continue doing. It is necessary to make a clean society and leave only those that contribute to its better performance.
