A man snatches the morsel of bread to a child and everyone agrees it's a terrible selfish, solely motivated by self-love. Another shared his last morsel with someone who is hungry, give your garment that is cold and moralists qualify him as a selfless, that is, the very opposite of selfishness. But soon we reflect, we see that both actions seem different in their results, they always have the same motive: to achieve pleasure. Either act to boost their selfishness. Have to seek pleasure or avoid pain, which is the same.
The idea of \u200b\u200bgood and evil in man, whatever their level of intellectual development. Consider how good it is useful to society you live and bad to bad for this. But most do not know more than the clan or family, hardly the nation and even harder to mankind. How can you expect to be considered as well as useful to human beings or who feel solidarity with their clan, despite his instincts so selfish? Becoming
anarchists, we declare war on the heap of lies, trickery, exploitation and deprivation. The governor, deceived, exploited, hurt, first of all, our feelings of equality, we do not want or exploited, or deception, and governed.
Our way of acting on others is a habit. Anyone who has purchased a high moral practice, is obviously superior to the good Christian who seeks to always be driven by the devil to do evil and can not stop it if it is threatened by the pains of hell or seduced by the joys of heaven.
We anarchists are not afraid to give the judge or the sentence. We are not afraid to declare "do what you want and however you want, because we are convinced that the vast majority of men, as they are educated and are removed from above the current constraints, will always act in a direction useful to society.
As moral fact we have no right to give advice and add: "Follow it if you feel good."
P. Kropotkin
0 comments:
Post a Comment